The debate over the management of public funds allocated to political activities has resurfaced in Senegal, with Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko taking a firm stance in favor of enhanced oversight. During a recent session at the National Assembly, Sonko addressed concerns raised by lawmakers about the transparency of these resources, emphasizing the need for rigorous control mechanisms.
Speaking before legislators, Ousmane Sonko underscored that the issue is not about eliminating political funds entirely but rather about ensuring they are used responsibly and accounted for properly. « Every franc from the Senegalese people must be tracked and justified, » he declared, reaffirming his commitment to preventing misuse of public funds.
As the leader of the Pastef party, Sonko highlighted that the proposal aligns with long-standing principles within his political movement. He also revealed that his own office at the Prime Minister’s residence manages political funds amounting to approximately 1.77 billion West African CFA francs, reinforcing his argument that the focus is on systemic accountability rather than targeting individuals.
While Sonko advocates for stricter controls, President Bassirou Diomaye Faye has previously defended the preservation of these funds, citing essential expenditures such as national security, intelligence operations, and diplomatic commitments. The Prime Minister acknowledged this divergence but maintained that institutional oversight remains non-negotiable.
Drawing comparisons with international practices, Sonko pointed out that several Western nations, including France, have established dedicated commissions to monitor special funds. He argued that Senegal could adopt similar frameworks to bolster transparency and public trust in political financing.
In a related development, Sonko confirmed discussions with the Head of State regarding a parliamentary initiative spearheaded by legislator Guy Marius Sagna. The Prime Minister cautioned that bypassing legislative scrutiny could undermine the government’s credibility and risk political setbacks for the administration.
